Alle | Deutsch | English

RECHTSANWALT M/W/D

Allgemein, GERMAN, Stellenangebot

KUSS Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB ist eine auf das internationale Wirtschaftsrecht spezialisierte Anwaltsboutique. Im Bereich des Transport- und Speditionsrechts gehören wir zu den führenden Kanzleien in Deutschland. Zur Verstärkung unseres Teams suchen wir ab sofort einen Rechtsanwalt (m/w/d) in Vollzeit/Teilzeit.

Ihre Aufgaben

  • Führung von Prozessen in den von uns abgedeckten Bereichen des Wirtschaftsrechts vor Landgerichten und Oberlandesgerichten in ganz Deutschland.
  • Mitarbeit in herausfordernden nationalen und internationalen Gerichts- und Schiedsverfahren sowie Beratungsmandaten.

Ihr Background

  • Interesse an einer Spezialisierung im Wirtschaftsrecht.
  • verhandlungssicheres Englisch. Idealerweise beherrschen Sie eine weitere Fremdsprache.

Ihr persönliches Profil

  • Sie verfügen über ein ausgeprägtes wirtschaftliches und technisches Verständnis.
  • Sie sind kommunikationsstark und lieben es, zu verhandeln. Empathie ist eine Ihrer Stärken.
  • Service- und Lösungsorientierung prägt Ihre Arbeit im Team und mit Mandanten.
  • Sie sind loyal, genau und effizient.

Unser Angebot
Wir bieten Ihnen eine spannende und abwechslungsreiche Tätigkeit in einem angenehmen Arbeitsklima am Kölner Rheinufer. Unsere Schwerpunkte ermöglichen Ihnen eine schnelle und intensive Spezialisierung im internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht. Sie werden nach einer gründlichen Einarbeitung die Möglichkeit haben, selbstständig und eigenverantwortlich zu arbeiten.

Bitte senden Sie Ihre aussagekräftige Bewerbung an: info@kuss-law.com

Stellenanzeige zum download

22. Juli 2019/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2019-07-22 10:43:162022-09-14 17:01:24RECHTSANWALT M/W/D

RECHTSANWALT M/W/D

Allgemein, GERMAN, Stellenangebot

KUSS Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB ist eine auf das internationale Wirtschaftsrecht spezialisierte Anwaltsboutique. Im Bereich des Transport- und Speditionsrechts gehören wir zu den führenden Kanzleien in Deutschland. Zur Verstärkung unseres Teams in diesem Bereich suchen wir ab sofort einen Rechtsanwalt (m/w/d) in Vollzeit/Teilzeit.

Ihre Aufgaben

  • Führung von Prozessen in den Bereichen des Transport- und Speditionsrechts, des Transportversicherungsrechts und des Produkthaftungsrechts vor Landgerichten und Oberlandesgerichten in ganz Deutschland.
  • Mitarbeit in herausfordernden nationalen und internationalen Gerichts- und Schiedsverfahren sowie Beratungsmandaten.

Ihr Background

  • mindestens zwei bis drei Jahre Prozesserfahrung in einer wirtschaftsrechtlich ausgerichteten Kanzlei, idealerweise im Bereich des Transport- und Speditionsrechts.
  • verhandlungssicheres Englisch und/oder Französisch.

Ihr persönliches Profil

  • Sie verfügen über ein ausgeprägtes wirtschaftliches und technisches Verständnis.
  • Sie sind kommunikationsstark und lieben es, zu verhandeln. Empathie ist eine Ihrer Stärken.
  • Service- und Lösungsorientierung prägt Ihre Arbeit im Team und mit Mandanten.
  • Sie sind loyal, genau und effizient.

Unser Angebot

Wir bieten Ihnen eine spannende und abwechslungsreiche Tätigkeit in einem angenehmen Arbeitsklima am Kölner Rheinufer. Unsere Schwerpunkte ermöglichen Ihnen eine schnelle und intensive Spezialisierung im Bereich des Transport- und Speditionsrecht und im internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht. Sie werden nach einer gründlichen Einarbeitung die Möglichkeit haben, selbstständig und eigenverantwortlich zu arbeiten.

Bitte senden Sie Ihre aussagekräftige Bewerbung an: info@kuss-law.com

Stellenanzeige zum download

2. Juli 2019/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2019-07-02 11:34:532022-09-14 17:01:35RECHTSANWALT M/W/D

BAR CERTIFIED SPECIALIST FOR INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW

ENGLISH, General News, International Business Law, Law, Social News

Maxim Miskewych was awarded the title of a Certified Specialist for International Business Law by the Cologne Bar Association.

A bar certified specialist (Fachanwalt) is a lawyer with proven expertise and practical experience in a particular area of law. The title is awarded by the Regional Bar Associations after having intensively examined whether the necessary prerequisites are fulfilled according to the Rules on Certified Specialist Lawyers (Fachanwaltsordnung). The lawyer has to demonstrate knowledge and skills in his specialty area reaching far beyond those generally gained during education, training and practical job experience.

Prior to achieving the status of specialist, the lawyer has to attend a 120 hour specializing course and pass several examinations. Moreover, the handling of a certain number of cases in the specialized area must be proven. A lawyer bearing the title “bar certified specialist” has to prove every year to have further expanded his expertise to the prescribed extent.

The German Rules on Bar Certified Specialist Lawyers (Fachanwaltsordnung) provide for a bar certified specialist in international commercial and business law to demonstrate special knowledge in the areas of

  1. conflict of laws of contractual and non-contractual obligations,
  2. international civil procedure and arbitration law,
  3. internationally harmonized commercial law,
  4. internationally harmonized corporate law,
  5. European state aid and competition law,
  6. main features of the regulations on the fight against corruption, fraud and money laundering in international legal transactions,
  7. main features in the realm of international tax law,
  8. main features of comparative law.

We congratulate Maxim Miskewych on successfully obtaining this title, which documents his remarkable competence in this demanding and important field of law.

22. Mai 2019/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2019-05-22 11:50:502022-09-14 17:01:45BAR CERTIFIED SPECIALIST FOR INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW

ASSIGNMENT OF THE COVERAGE CLAIM

Claims Recovery, Dispute Resolution, ENGLISH, Insurance

According to a recent judgement of the Regional Court (Landgericht) of Bremen, a transport liability insurer cannot invoke a prohibition of assignment, if this would result in the policyholder becoming insolvent as a result of the insured transport damage.

 

In the event of transport damage, the injured party has no direct claim against the carrier’s liability insurer. Generally, transport liability policies provide for a prohibition of the assignment of coverage claims in the case of an ongoing insurance policy. In this case, an agreement to prohibit offsetting is permissible in the insurance contract. For the injured party, this means it can only assert claims against the carrier itself. Depending on the amount of the claim, in the worst case he will have to litigate for years. If the policyholder is ultimately unable to pay, the carrier is threatened with insolvency.

In the case decided by the Regional Court of Bremen, our client, the customer of a carrier specializing in the transport of heavy goods asserted claims for damages due to a business interruption at an aluminum factory. The rectifier carried to the factory had collided with a bridge during the transport. The unit could not be delivered. The consignee suffered a considerable reduction in production capacity for months.  The insurer initially refused to release its policyholder. Due to the damage amounting to millions, this would have inevitably resulted in the carrier’s insolvency.  In this situation, the carrier decided to compensate part of the loss and to assign its coverage claims against its insurer to the claimant in the course of a settlement.

As expected, the sued insurer invoked the prohibition of assignment.

The Regional Court decided that as assignee the injured party had become the owner of the claims. This was not opposed by the prohibition of assignment effectively agreed in the insurance contract. However, on the basis of good faith, the insurer was prevented from invoking the prohibition of assignment. In the decided case, there was clearly a risk that in the course of a liability lawsuit against the carrier, the claimant would ultimately run idle due to insolvency. In the end, only a claim for assignment against the insolvency administrator would have remained for the claimant, cf. judgement of the Regional Court (Landgericht) of Bremen of November 6, 2018, file no. 11 O 226/15 (final and absolute).

Accordingly, since the exclusion of the assignment provided for in the insurance contract would have led to the same result as a direct claim against the insurer, but at the price of the insolvency of the policyholder, the insurer could not invoke the prohibition of assignment.

                                                            Robert N. Kuss, LL.M.oec.

15. März 2019/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2019-03-15 14:07:432022-09-14 17:01:52ASSIGNMENT OF THE COVERAGE CLAIM

DOKUMENTATIONS – UND AUFBEWAHRUNGSPFLICHTEN IM FAHRPERSONALRECHT

General News, GERMAN

Die Dokumentationspflichten im Hinblick auf die Arbeitszeiten von LKW-Fahrern sind in der Regel hinreichend bekannt. Dies gilt jedoch nicht unbedingt für die Folgen eines Verstoßes. Diese können empfindlich sein. Es können Bußgeldbescheide bis in den sechsstelligen Bereich drohen.

Sowohl Unternehmer als auch Fahrer sind gesetzlich dazu verpflichtet, für die Funktionsfähigkeit von Kontrollgeräten (Tachograph/Fahrtenschreiber) in den Lkw und deren ordnungsgemäß Nutzbarkeit zu sorgen. Darüber hinaus muss auch die ordnungsgemäße Funktion und Nutzung der Fahrerkarte sichergestellt werden.

Unternehmer sind ferner verpflichtet, die Arbeitszeitnachweise (Schaublätter, Aufzeichnungen, digitale Daten und Ausdrucke) ein Jahr lang gut geordnet aufzubewahren und auf Verlangen der zuständigen Aufsichtsbehörde (Gewerbeaufsichtsamt) vorzulegen oder einzusenden. Die Aufsichtsbehörden führen stichprobenartige Kontrollen durch, um die Einhaltung der Arbeitsschutzbestimmungen zu überprüfen.

Kommt der Unternehmer seinen Dokumentations- und Aufbewahrungspflichten nicht nach, so drohen ihm Geldbußen in Höhe von 750,00 € je 24-Stunden-Zeitraum und Fahrer, für die keine Nachweise vorgelegt werden können. Nicht selten werden von den Behörden daher Bußgeldbescheide im sechsstelligen Bereich erlassen.

Beim Verlust oder Diebstahl der Fahrerkarte oder der Arbeitszeitnachweise ist sofortiges Handeln geboten. Spätestens beim Erhalt der Aufforderung der Aufsichtsbehörde, Arbeitszeitnachweise vorzulegen oder einzusenden, empfiehlt es sich, einen Rechtsanwalt einzuschalten und nicht abzuwarten, bis ein Bußgeldbescheid erlassen worden ist. Im Vorhinein kann in der Regel die Höhe des Bußgeldbescheides außergerichtlich und kostensparend signifikant reduziert werden.

Maxim Miskewych, Rechtsanwalt

25. Februar 2019/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2019-02-25 09:35:132022-09-14 17:02:03DOKUMENTATIONS - UND AUFBEWAHRUNGSPFLICHTEN IM FAHRPERSONALRECHT

THE DELAYED SUITCASE

Aviation, Claims Recovery, Dispute Resolution, ENGLISH

According to a judgement of the Local Court (Amtsgericht) of Cologne (legally binding), in the event of delayed delivery of baggage, the air carrier must pay compensation in the amount of the costs of necessary and appropriate replacement in accordance with Article 19 of the Montreal Convention. The traveler must accept the benefit of the purchased replacement clothing to be offset in the amount of 15% of the purchase price. (AG Köln, file ref.: 119 C 51/13, judgement of 03.06.2013, legally binding after dismissal of the appeal by resolution pursuant to Section 522 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).

In principle, the air carrier must compensate the damage which occurs during the carriage of baggage by air as a result of the latter being transported and delivered late. Despite this clear regulation, airlines often have trouble reimbursing travelers for the cost of replacement clothing within the liability limit of 1,000 SDRs (approx. 1,250 €). This is often justified by the fact that no damage was incurred by the traveler, because he now has the newly purchased clothing.

In the judgment cited above, the Local Court of Cologne decided how this benefit resulting from the newly purchased clothing is to be taken into account in the assessment of damages.

This decision had to be obtained on our own behalf. I flew from Cologne/Bonn airport to Zurich/Kloten on a Sunday at 4:55 p.m. to give a lecture on international contract law at 9:00 a.m. on Monday. I checked in my wardrobe, consisting of suit, shirt, tie, underwear and socks, packed in a garment bag. After my arrival in Zurich I waited in vain at the baggage carousel for the garment bag, went to the Lost & Found counter and was informed that my garment bag was still in Cologne. An arrival of my wardrobe for the lecture the next morning was not to be expected any more.

Since I didn’t want to give my lecture in casual clothes, I went to a clothing store at the airport and bought a new suit including shirt, tie, underwear and socks for about 1,000 Swiss francs, and considering the time and place of the purchase this was in the lowest price segment. A purchase in another shop before 09:00 the next morning was not possible.

The airline reacted with rejection to the assertion of the purchase price as damage. After several months of waiting for an amicable settlement, the claim for damages had to be filed in court, as the airline was of the opinion that I would have needed a suit anyway.

The court saw this differently. It justified its decision with the fact that the purchase of a suit as well as of the other pieces of clothing was necessary in view of the cause of the journey – a lecture. Due to the day of the week and the date of the lecture the next morning, there had been no cheaper shopping possibilities. A claim for compensation of the purchase price was also not excluded on the grounds that I had saved the purchase of another suit by purchasing this suit. The court stated that it is to be assumed that an acute need for wardrobe does not exist, when going on a job-related lecture journey. The traveler must, however, accept a benefit sharing for the acquired clothing to be offset, which is to be estimated here at 15% of the purchase value. This estimate is based in particular on the regularly very low resale value of used clothing.

The airline had not demanded the return of the suit and the undergarments before and during the proceedings, so that in the opinion of the court there was no claim for handover of the suit concurrently against payment of the total price.

ROBERT N. KUSS, LL.M. oec., Bar certified specialist in international business law,

Bar certified specialist in transportation and forwarding law

19. Februar 2019/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2019-02-19 13:29:212022-09-14 17:02:11THE DELAYED SUITCASE

THE CONTAINERS OF MSC ZOE

Claims Recovery, ENGLISH, Maritime Law and Transportation Law

She’s on everyone’s lips these days. At the beginning of January, one of the world’s largest container ships, the MSC Zoe, lost about 300 containers on her way from Antwerp in Belgium to the German port of Bremerhaven in the German Exclusive Economic Zone, including some with hazardous goods. The search for and salvage of the containers is currently in progress. But who is actually liable in the event of container loss?

The_Container_of_MSC_ZOE90% of the goods traded worldwide are transported by sea. On average, there are around 5-6 million containers at sea every second, and around 130 million a year. Given the volume of containers transported, it is inevitable that containers will get lost at sea. Estimates range from around 500 to 1,600 containers per year, not taking into account major casualties such as the sinking of MOL Comfort. Since the containers of MSC Zoe are not an isolated case, it is worth taking a look at the legal aspects of container loss at sea.

Am I allowed to pick up stranded goods and keep them?

After the abolition of the stranding regulations (Strandungsordnung), the law on finding of the German Civil Code (Fundrecht) applies in Germany. The owner therefore remains the owner of the cargo even if he does not know in detail where the cargo is located. If the cargo is washed up on the beach and found there by third parties, the finder must always report the discovery to the owner or another authorized recipient (e.g. coastguard / authority). If the finder retains the found cargo, he may render himself liable to prosecution for misappropriation in accordance with Section 246 of the German Criminal Code (StGB). However, this is governed very differently on an international level.

Are the owners entitled to compensation for loss or damage?

In principle, carriers/shipping companies or (fixed cost) forwarding agents are liable, regardless of fault, for damage caused by loss of or damage to the cargo during carriage. The owners or cargo interests are therefore generally entitled to compensation claims against the carrier or freight forwarder, which may be limited in amount. The responsible carrier is only exempt from the obligation to pay compensation if it can prove one of the reasons for exclusion of liability provided for in maritime law. The carrier can only invoke bad weather and even storm if the particularly bad weather conditions in this area were not to be expected at this time of year. Given the accuracy of today’s weather forecasts, this is likely to apply only in exceptional cases.

Who is liable for damage to ships that collide with the containers?

Another problem of container loss at sea is the fact that many containers float a few centimeters below the water surface in the sea and do not sink to the seabed. Since the danger is so hardly recognizable, it happens that ships or boats collide with containers. This can have fatal consequences, especially for recreational craft and smaller ships. The owners of ships that are damaged by colliding with containers are generally not deprived of their rights. They may be entitled to claims for damages in tort against the shipping company, the owner of the container ship or the owner of the containers if the containers were not or not properly stowed and secured on the container ship and/or the container ship itself was not seaworthy and/or the salvage of the container was culpably omitted. In such cases, however, it is problematic to identify the container and locate the person responsible.

Who is liable for the clean-up costs/environmental damage?

As a matter of principle, the “Stoerer” (disturber) is obliged to remove the (environmental) damage he has caused. The legally not conclusively defined term “Stoerer” is partly differently understood in the German jurisdiction, so that the determination of the responsible person is possible only with the knowledge of all circumstances of the individual case. In the case of MSC Zoe, the carrier, the shipowner and the owner of the cargo can be considered as obligated parties to remedy the damage.

                                           Maxim Miskewych, Rechtsanwalt

4. Februar 2019/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2019-02-04 14:18:202022-09-14 17:02:24THE CONTAINERS OF MSC ZOE

RECKLESS DAMAGE

Claims Recovery, Dispute Resolution, ENGLISH, Maritime Law and Transportation Law

According to a judgement of the Regional Court (LG) of Cologne achieved by us, the carrier has unlimited liability if he has failed to check whether all four support stands have been folded out before parking a swap body.

Reckless Damage Kuss LawThe conditions under which a consignor of goods is entitled to unlimited compensation in the event of damage during transport are rarely met. According to German law, the carrier must at least be accused of reckless fault in the knowledge that damage is likely to occur.

The Regional Court of Cologne (judgement of 20.12.2018, ref. 85 O 22/17, not yet legally binding) has decided that the parking of a swap body without prior control of whether all four support stands are folded out is a reckless fault.

The transport insurer of a designer furniture manufacturer had sued. The furniture had been sold and stowed in a swap body for transport. The driver of the transport company first took the swap body to his own premises to park it there. In the course of the procedure, it turned out that the driver had accidentally folded out only three stands of the swap body instead of all four. When being questioned, the driver stated that he had failed to extend the fourth stand because he was in a hurry. After the truck drove out under the swap body, this overturned and the goods were damaged.

The Regional Court of Cologne considered the driver’s conduct to be a reckless fault – and not, as the defendant claimed, a possibly excusable “Augenblicksversagen” (mistake made in the heat of the moment). Accordingly, the defendant could not invoke the limitation of liability of Section 431 of the German Commercial Code (HGB) in the amount of approx. 10.00 €/kg. In the court’s opinion, parking a swap body is a particularly damage-relevant procedure. Here the driver does not only have to provide for the necessary stability of the swap body, but beyond that pulling out the vehicle, on which the body was transported, requires a high concentration of the driver. According to the court, the damages that threaten to occur in the event of a handling error are considerable. In this case, the driver had grossly neglected to pay the necessary attention, as he had failed to do the most obvious thing, namely folding out all four supports of the container.

Do you have any questions concerning the carrier’s liability? We will be happy to answer them.

Vanessa Steinbacher, B.A., Attorney at law (Rechtsanwältin) and bar certified
specialist in transportation and forwarding law

10. Januar 2019/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2019-01-10 18:25:292022-09-14 17:02:33RECKLESS DAMAGE

The Legal500

Allgemein

Legal500 lists KUSS Rechtsanwälte as a “leading firm” in the field of transport and thus as one of the 8 best law firms in this field in Germany.

“For 32 years, The Legal 500 has been analysing the capabilities of law firms across the world, with a comprehensive research programme revised and updated every year to bring the most up-to-date vision of the global legal market. The Legal 500 assesses the strengths of law firms in over 150 jurisdictions, the results of which can be viewed free of charge using the “Rankings” tab at the top of the page.

The rankings are based on a series of criteria, but simply put, we highlight the practice area teams who are providing the most cutting edge and innovative advice to corporate counsel. Our research is based on feedback from 300,000 clients worldwide, submissions from law firms and interviews with leading private practice lawyers, and a team of researchers who have unrivalled experience in the legal market.”, cf. https://www.legal500.com/assets/pages/about-us/about-us.html

We take this as an opportunity to thank our team for the excellent work over the past months.

10. Dezember 2018/0 Kommentare/von simone
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 simone https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg simone2018-12-10 09:57:192018-12-10 11:24:40The Legal500

BAR CERTIFIED SPECIALIST VANESSA STEINBACHER

Allgemein, ENGLISH, General News, Maritime Law and Transportation Law, Social News

Vanessa Steinbacher was awarded the title of bar certified specialist in transportation and forwarding law.

A bar certified specialist is a lawyer with proven expertise and practical experience in a particular area of law. The title is awarded by the Regional Bar Associations after having intensively examined whether the necessary prerequisites are fulfilled according to the Rules on Bar Certified Specialist Lawyers (Fachanwaltsordnung). The lawyer has to demonstrate knowledge and skills in his specialty area reaching far beyond those generally gained during education, training and practical job experience. Prior to achieving the status of specialist, the lawyer has to attend a 120 hour specializing course and pass several examinations. Moreover, the handling of a certain number of cases in the specialized area must be proven. A lawyer bearing the title “bar certified specialist” has to prove every year to have further expanded his expertise to the prescribed extent.

Congratulations Vanessa!

17. Oktober 2017/0 Kommentare/von robert.kuss@kuss-law.com
https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg 0 0 robert.kuss@kuss-law.com https://businesslaw-briefings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Kuss_BLB_Logo.jpg robert.kuss@kuss-law.com2017-10-17 21:54:222022-09-14 17:03:06BAR CERTIFIED SPECIALIST VANESSA STEINBACHER
Seite 2 von 41234

IMF, special drawing rights (XDR)

The Currency Converter is powered by Investing.com

For more detailed information regarding the XDR (SZR) please visit https://www.imf.org/external/np/fin/data/sdr_ir.aspx

Melden Sie sich zu unserem Newsletter an

E-Mail*
Vorname
Nachname
 
 

Neueste Beiträge

  • HAFTUNG BEI KÜHLKETTENUNTERBRECHUNGEN
  • German Maritime Law
  • PREISANPASSUNGEN BEI KRISENBEDINGTEN KOSTENSTEIGERUNGEN
  • EVER GIVEN – WIE GEHT ES WEITER?
  • EVER GIVEN – WER ZAHLT DIE RECHNUNG? – Video

Kategorien

  • Allgemein
  • Aviation
  • Claims Management
  • Claims Recovery
  • Damage
  • Dispute Resolution
  • ENGLISH
  • Events
  • General News
  • GERMAN
  • Handelsrecht
  • Industrie und Handel
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • International Business Law
  • Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht
  • Kaufrecht
  • Law
  • Lectures
  • Litigation
  • Maritime Law and Transportation Law
  • Social News
  • Stellenangebot
  • Transportation Law
  • Unlimited Liability

Archive

  • Januar 2023
  • September 2022
  • Juli 2022
  • Mai 2021
  • April 2021
  • Februar 2020
  • Oktober 2019
  • September 2019
  • Juli 2019
  • Mai 2019
  • März 2019
  • Februar 2019
  • Januar 2019
  • Dezember 2018
  • Oktober 2017
  • September 2017
  • September 2015
  • März 2015
  • Januar 2015
  • Juni 2014
  • Dezember 2013
  • November 2013
  • Oktober 2013
  • September 2013
  • Juli 2013
  • April 2013
KUSS Rechtsanwälte 2023
  • Facebook
  • Xing
  • LinkedIn
  • Karriere
  • Datenschutz
  • Impressum
  • Cookie-Richtlinie (EU)
Nach oben scrollen
Cookie-Zustimmung verwalten
Um Ihnen ein optimales Erlebnis zu bieten, verwenden wir Technologien wie Cookies, um Geräteinformationen zu speichern bzw. darauf zuzugreifen. Wenn Sie diesen Technologien zustimmen, können wir Daten wie das Surfverhalten oder eindeutige IDs auf dieser Website verarbeiten. Wenn Sie Ihre Zustimmung nicht erteilen oder zurückziehen, können bestimmte Merkmale und Funktionen beeinträchtigt werden.
Funktional Immer aktiv
Der Zugriff oder die technische Speicherung ist unbedingt für den rechtmäßigen Zweck erforderlich, um die Nutzung eines bestimmten Dienstes zu ermöglichen, der vom Abonnenten oder Nutzer ausdrücklich angefordert wurde, oder für den alleinigen Zweck der Übertragung einer Nachricht über ein elektronisches Kommunikationsnetz.
Vorlieben
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff ist für den rechtmäßigen Zweck der Speicherung von Voreinstellungen erforderlich, die nicht vom Abonnenten oder Nutzer beantragt wurden.
Statistiken
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff, der ausschließlich zu statistischen Zwecken erfolgt. Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff, der ausschließlich zu anonymen statistischen Zwecken verwendet wird. Ohne eine Aufforderung, die freiwillige Zustimmung Ihres Internetdienstanbieters oder zusätzliche Aufzeichnungen von Dritten können die zu diesem Zweck gespeicherten oder abgerufenen Informationen allein in der Regel nicht zu Ihrer Identifizierung verwendet werden.
Marketing
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff ist erforderlich, um Nutzerprofile zu erstellen, um Werbung zu versenden oder um den Nutzer auf einer Website oder über mehrere Websites hinweg zu ähnlichen Marketingzwecken zu verfolgen.
Optionen verwalten Dienste verwalten Anbieter verwalten Lesen Sie mehr über diese Zwecke
Voreinstellungen anzeigen
{title} {title} {title}